Prior to the 2014 Immigration Regulations, foreign nationals in South Africa that overstayed their visit in the country were sanctioned with a fine upon their departure.

However since the amendment was affected in 2014, the Department of Home Affairs has implemented a more stringent sanction to those individuals who overstay their visit or upon expiry of their visa in South Africa. Despite the cause or reason for overstay, the person is sanctioned with a declaration of undesirability and therefore banned from returning to South Africa for a specified period of time, determined according to the contravention of their time overstayed.

An ‘undesirable person’, in terms of Section 30(1)(h) and Regulation 27(3) as set out in the Immigration Amendment Act, No 13 of 2011 and Directive 9 is defined as:

“a person that overstays within the Republic after the expiry of their visa will be declared as undesirable”.

Visa overstays result in long bans

If a foreign national overstays for a period of less than 30 days, he/she will be banned for a period of 12 months and given the status of an ‘undesirable person’. An overstay of more than 30 days results in one being banned for a period of 5 years from South Africa and the individual may only re-enter after the expiration of the specified period of time.

The 2014 Amendment and Directive 9 confirms the position of Regulation 27(3) read together with Section 30(1)(h). These legislative provisions provide that, even if a foreign national submitted an application for an extension of an existing visa, where that visa expired after submission thereof, such persons can and will be declared as undesirable. Grounds for declaring a person undesirable may vary and is not exhaustive.

Appeal for Overstay to the Department of Home Affairs

Any person aggrieved by these new laws, whether it is a local citizen or a foreign national, may approach the Department of Home Affairs by means of an appeal process. It is commonly referred to as an ‘Appeal for Overstay’. If you have been declared as undesirable you can apply to have the status appealed within a period of ten days. Thereafter, the department will attend to your appeal within 48 hours but there is no guarantee that the matter will be dealt with according to the time frame indicated by the department, as immigration-related matters can become time consuming.

Factors that may influence a decision

The formal appeal process provides the aggrieved person an opportunity to motivate why the status of undesirability should be removed and the ban be lifted. One has to provide substantial reasons to motivate the change of his/her immigration status in South Africa.

Various factors may be taken into account for written representations, such as:

  • a foreign national visiting a spouse, child, parents or dependant minor/relative in South Africa,
  • a pending application for a temporary or permanent residency,
  • employment contract,
  • studies,
  • medical conditions, and
  • any personal circumstances that may support one’s appeal to be successful.

There are however factors that may negatively affect one’s appeal application such as a previous incident of overstay; or any serious medical condition that may have dire consequences. Despite the fact that these factors may be taken into consideration, an appeal may or may not have a successful outcome.

Recent court cases dealing with undesirability

The following two cases dealt with aggrieved families that were affected by the declaration of undesirability.

Johnson and Others v Minister of Home Affairs and Others; InRe: Delorie and Others v Minister of Home Affairs and Another (10310/2014, 10452/2014) [2014] ZAWCHC 101 (30 June 2014)

These cases were consolidated due to the fact that in both matters they, Johnson and Delorie, both sought urgent relief on similar issues that were raised, thus asking the court to remove the ban.

The court held that due to the status of an undesirable person both Applicants along with their families suffered prejudice and had no other remedy available to them at the time of instituting the urgent applications. The declaration was then suspended and they were allowed to re-enter and remain in South Africa.

The court also considered the urgent nature of the applications and the fact that the applicants had demonstrated the possession of a prima facie right to relief. The court stated that “in both instances the affected persons do not pose a threat to the security of the country and, in fact, no such threat is alleged in the (court) papers thus, the return of the affected applicants to the country should pose no threat to any person.

Foreign nationals must apply for visa extension 60 days prior to expiry

The court further held that foreign nationals who seek the extension of existing visas must ensure that such applications are made at least 60 days prior to expiry of their existing visas. Failure to do so may result in such foreign nationals being declared as ‘undesirable’ persons.

Immigration amendments are stringent and may prove harmful

In light of the abovementioned cases, it is evident that the new immigration laws may prove to be more prejudicial to both local and foreign nationals. These laws seem to be rather harsh and very little public consultation took place during its enactment.

Our Immigration Law team is highly skilled and experienced and can assist with any legal matters pertaining to work, business and study visas, permanent residence, naturalisation, overstay appeals and the lifting of an ‘undesirable persons’ ban.

For legal advice pertaining to Immigration Law

Wesley Scheepers



The articles on these web pages are provided for general information purposes only. Whilst care has been taken to ensure accuracy, the content provided is not intended to stand alone as legal advice. Always consult a suitably qualified attorney on any specific legal problem or matter.