Foreign marriages and divorces: what does the law say?
In the past, when people were mostly confined to single jurisdictions, actions – such as divorces – were administered in a fairly trouble-free manner. In today’s mobile world, our borders have become porous and international marriages have become increasingly more common.
The conflict of laws and its choice of law rules are highly relevant to determine not only the circumstances under which a decree of divorce may be obtained in countries in which spouses have no permanent or habitual residence, but also when one state will recognise and enforce a divorce granted in another state.
Lex loci celebrationis: the law of the land where the marriage was celebrated
To determine the formal validity of the marriage is simple enough: one only needs to look at the laws of the country in which the marriage was solemnised (i.e. where the marriage certificate was issued). This is referred to as the lex loci celebrationis.
However, the country where the marriage was formalised does not necessarily govern the proprietary consequences of that marriage.
Husband’s country of domicile determines law
The problem arises where one or both parties are not domiciled in the same country, or where the marriage is solemnised in a country where neither parties are currently living.
Our courts have reiterated that under the common law, the marital property regime is determined according to the law applicable in the husband’s country of domicile at the time of the marriage. This is mainly based on the premise that a wife is considered to be willing to follow her husband wherever he may go, and thus discards her country in favour of her spouse’s.
Once matrimonial domicile is established, it cannot be changed. Thus, the matrimonial domicile determines the law applicable to the proprietary consequences of the marriage. The principle of immutability is applicable. This is advantageous for the wife, as her husband cannot change domiciles to put her in a weaker position.
Matrimonial domicile principles are outdated in today’s world
Obviously, it could be argued that these principles are outdated. In today’s ever changing world, where equality and non-discrimination reign supreme, it could be argued that a wife should not have to take on the domicile of her husband.
Besides this sexist aspect of domicile, another question which remains to be answered is what about foreign same-sex marriages? It would be interesting to determine which spouse changes domicile and to see how the High Court would handle such a case.
As a specialist in foreign divorces, I use my expertise to protect either the husband or the wife – depending on whom I am acting for. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any queries.
Juan Smuts and Amber Lotz | Abrahams & Gross Attorneys
t 021 422 1323 | e email@example.com
The articles on these web pages are provided for general information purposes only. Whilst care has been taken to ensure accuracy, the content provided is not intended to stand alone as legal advice. Always consult a suitably qualified attorney on any specific legal problem or matter.
Tagged abrahams and gross, attorney cape town, cape town attorney, cape town attorney juan smuts, divorce law, divorce south africa, divorces, family law, Family Law Attorney Cape Town, family lawyer, foreign divorce south africa law, foreign marriage, foreign marriages south african law, international marriage, spousal maintenance